CO129-234 - Acting Governor Cameron Governor Des Voeus - 1887 [9-12] — Page 224

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

1

£1

and His Excellency, in calling the attention of the magistrates to the ordinance and the case above cited, would suggest that they should restrict their inquiry accordingly, as he is of opinion that to require quasher perof would be acting contrary to the provisions of the Treaty and the clear intention of the late Ordinance.

4. He is glad to add that in explanation of the delay of the Ordinance, more than one of the Solicitors either for the prosecution or defence was engaged elsewhere in cases which were proposed for continuing the enquiry for the same day, and His Excellency is of opinion that the magistrates should fix days for the hearing, should not grant postponements merely for the convenience of the Solicitor, but only on good and sufficient grounds; and, if the lawyers or one of them do not choose to attend, he should proceed with the case without them. His Excellency thinks it not improbable that the Colonial Office, in view of the great delays which have taken place in some of the cases instongkong, may ask the Colonial Office for some explanation of the time which these preliminary inquiries have occupied and of the delays meted with the hearing of the same.

5. Frederick Stewart,

Acting Colonial Secretary.

Edit History

2026-05-25 20:17:31 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
1 £1 and His Excellency, in calling the attention of the magistrates to the ordinance and the case above cited, would suggest that they should restrict their inquiry accordingly, as he is of opinion that to require quasher perof would be acting contrary to the provisions of the Treaty and the clear intention of the late Ordinance. 4. He is glad to add that in explanation of the delay of the Ordinance, more than one of the Solicitors either for the prosecution or defence was engaged elsewhere in cases which were proposed for continuing the enquiry for the same day, and His Excellency is of opinion that the magistrates should fix days for the hearing, should not grant postponements merely for the convenience of the Solicitor, but only on good and sufficient grounds; and, if the lawyers or one of them do not choose to attend, he should proceed with the case without them. His Excellency thinks it not improbable that the Colonial Office, in view of the great delays which have taken place in some of the cases instongkong, may ask the Colonial Office for some explanation of the time which these preliminary inquiries have occupied and of the delays meted with the hearing of the same. 5. Frederick Stewart, Acting Colonial Secretary.
Baseline (Original)
1 £ 1 and His Excellency, in calling the attention of the bagistrates to the ordinance and the case would suggest above cited, that they should restrict their inquiry accordingt, as be rs of opinion that to require quasher perof would be acting contrary to the provisions of stic Treaty and the clear exactinen 4. dam on of the late delay of the Ordinance. toadd that in ene the long explained by othe fact than one of the Solicitors eisher for the prosecution to defence was engaged elsewhere in dege which were proposed for contiming the enquiry for the sar is on dayspired stis Excellency s of opinion that the magistrali, should 221 anad Shired fix days for the hearing, should not grant postponements merely for the convenience of the Solicitor, but only hearing good and sufficient. grounds; and, if the lawyers one of them do not choose to attend, he should proced with the ease without them. His Exellency hinks it not improbable that the dreige office in view of the great belays which have taken place in some of the cases instongkong may ask to Colonial office for mon explanation of the time which these preliminary inquiries have occupied and of the delays meeted with the hearing of she sawe. Shaves. 5. Frederick Sawort, Ack Corniaesixenry $ 4T4
2026-05-25 20:17:31 · Baseline
View content

1

£

1

and His Excellency, in calling the attention of the bagistrates to the ordinance and the case

would suggest

above cited,

that they should restrict their inquiry accordingt, as be rs of opinion that

to require quasher perof would be acting

contrary to the provisions

of stic Treaty and the clear

exactinen

4. dam

on of the late

delay

of the Ordinance.

toadd that in

ene

the long explained by othe

fact than one of the Solicitors

eisher

for

the prosecution

to defence was engaged

elsewhere in dege which

were proposed for contiming the enquiry

for the sar

is

on dayspired

stis Excellency

s of opinion that the magistrali,

should

221

anad

Shired fix days for the hearing,

should not grant postponements merely for the convenience of the Solicitor, but only hearing good and sufficient. grounds; and, if the lawyers

one of them do not choose to attend, he should proced with the ease without them. His Exellency hinks it not improbable that the dreige office in view of the great belays which have taken place in some of the cases

instongkong may ask to Colonial office for mon explanation of the time which these preliminary inquiries have occupied and of the delays

meeted

with the hearing of she sawe.

Shaves.

5. Frederick Sawort,

Ack Corniaesixenry

$

4T4

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.